Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Foresta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Foresta

A targetted Google for either the character or the actor produce no results. Hoax? ➨ REDVERS in a car - no brakes? I don't mind 08:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete was about to tag this as a hoax, like the editor's previous creation. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, ec'd with you on adding Ilex Marrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to this AfD. Consider it now added :o) ➨ REDVERS in a car - no brakes? I don't mind 08:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is about a character in a soap opera; it's certainly not notable. I'd like to speedy it under A7, but it doesn't quite fit. As an adjunct, however, please note the massive number of articles on characters in the same soap (see List of Home and Away characters). --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 08:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are huge numbers of character articles, but this one is actually a hoax. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Search for sources leads me to believe this is a blatant hoax. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I too could not find any sources to verify this article's contents. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 00:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Your deletionist attitude really irks me with regard to this article. This article has 43 google hits including many notable sites. I try to be reasonable, but the deletionist cabal offends me sometimes. Testmasterflex (talk)
  - That's the first time I've ever been called a deletionist. Anyway, I'm always open to changing my mind, but could you be specific with regards to the sources? I searched Google again and the first three that turn up are Facebook, Wikipedia, and some salesperson. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 06:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - The sheer irony of this situation had me laughing on the ground and gasping for breath for a second. Thank you God for showing that the world has a sense of humor :p sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 06:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Me of all people being designated a deletionist may be one of the signs of the apocalypse... --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        I have no opinion at all with regard to this AfD, but I also laughed out loud at this characterization of LGRdC. Deor (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable per WP:RSTestmasterflex (talk) 04:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no non-trivial coverage by reliable sources independent of the topic to assert notability, nor any sources to verify the article's contents or prove that it's not a hoax. sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 07:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Call WP:RS all you want, too bad there are none Sui get su 22:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.