Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark S. A. Smith
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark S. A. Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of importance, fails WP:N. All reliable sources linked in the article are not actually coverage of the subject but coverage of organizations he was involved in. High number of self-published sources that do not establish notability. BelloWello (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no indication that the topic meets WP:BIO, no indication of substantive third party sourcing. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 10:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nominator BelloWello has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia for sock puppetry. Is this AfD still valid? OCNative (talk) 14:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Regardless of the nominator's status, the subject of this article fails notability. No independent reliable sourcing about him found. Claim to fame is some self-published and online books. --MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.