Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martín Almagro Basch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Nominator is a blocked editor. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martín Almagro Basch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been tagged as an orphan for over five years, and only covers one source. That aside, I don't see enough historical significance for the person to sustain an article. ImmaImmaTaco (talk) 11:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 June 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep. @ImmaImmaTaco: please read WP:BEFORE if you haven't already. We don't delete articles because they are orphans, or because they cite only a few sources (many excellent articles do). I presume that what you mean by "I don't see enough historical significance for the person to sustain an article" is that the subject is not notable. On the contrary, he appears to notable both as a figure in the Spanish Civil War [1][2] and as an archaeologist [3][4][5][6]. es:Martín Almagro Basch looks well developed and good be a basis for expansion of our article. – Joe (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.