Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Wiesmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Wiesmann

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I speedy-deleted the article for promotion, and it was then recreated with the promotional material removed. It was then PRODded, but the PROD was removed. On its face (I haven't done WP:BEFORE because I'm lousy at it, especially when most of the sources are non-English), Wiesmann appears to be a senior investment banker but nothing rising to the level of satisfying WP:GNG. Although not dispositive here, Wiesmann doesn't have an article at de.wiki. Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Finance, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can find sourcing about a radiologist/doctor, a German car company and a few other things, but nothing comes up for this particular person. Sourcing used now in the article is either primary, or confirmation of his appointment to one job or another. I don't see notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete doesn’t seem to meet WP:ANYBIO. Saw a lot of sources, but most of them basically the same biography. No WP:SIGCOV. Vorann Gencov (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO as a WP:MILL investment banker. All sources are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.