Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Cyrene Burch Breckinridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Cyrene Burch Breckinridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability can't be inherited as the wife of a US vice president. A redirect to her husband seems to be the logical choice.

Keep for now. We currently have biographies of all the wives of U.S. vice-presidents, which are listed at Second Lady of the United States. I suppose consensus can change, but I favor keeping this status quo, at least until a thorough discussion takes place about the whole group of articles. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. That's what this is, a test case to see if most of the rest of the second ladies should go or not. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- I would have to agree with Cullen on this. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 07:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unremarkable woman who does not meet WP:BIO. --Inother (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I also side with Cullen328 on this matter. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep add me to the list supporting Cullen328's rationale, but definitely improve references. Elgatodegato (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.