Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashiyu Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mashiyu Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find a reliable source providing coverage of the subject. Delete per WP:GNG. Author contested WP:PROD. Odie5533 (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has produced at least one game that I could check. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - having produced a game does not establish notability unless that game has received significant coverage in reliable sources.Dialectric (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources (just PR site and company pages); created by an SPA as likely spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. absolutely nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; lack of reliable sources. Seems very promotional. 11coolguy12 (talk) 06:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.