Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Pierce Rayer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Master Pierce Rayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional character from a non-notable video game. Not appropriate to merge anywhere. —Farix (t | c) 21:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 21:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect: to Gundam. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unnotable character from a seemingly unnotable game; redirect to Gundam doesn't seem appropriate when the game itself has no article; fails WP:N. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or merge to the appropriate list of characters--seems major enough to include. DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And to which is the appropriate list? If you can't identify a valid merge target, then there is nothing to merge. Instead, it nothing more then an WP:ILIKEIT comment. —Farix (t | c) 01:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is no list of characters in..., then it should be made. There's always the main article, but that usually is not the best place. I would describe the basis for my !vote the view that any character who plays a role in the plot of a fiction should at least be be redirected to a list, and whether or not I like the article, the character or the fiction has nothing to do with it. I am profoundly uninterested in them all; I am interested in Wikipedia having some mention of all significant elements of all notable fictions. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- He doesn't play any role in the series itself, but appears only in the single game, which is unnotable on its own. Such a minor character is not appropriate for inclusion in a character list for the series as a whole. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is no list of characters in..., then it should be made. There's always the main article, but that usually is not the best place. I would describe the basis for my !vote the view that any character who plays a role in the plot of a fiction should at least be be redirected to a list, and whether or not I like the article, the character or the fiction has nothing to do with it. I am profoundly uninterested in them all; I am interested in Wikipedia having some mention of all significant elements of all notable fictions. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Collectonion, fails notability. JBsupreme (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.