Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matej Paulovič

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Paulovič

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: G7 for failure to assert a claim of notability ... and even with that, the subject is an amateur youth player of no particular distinction, the article being created by a SPA who edited Wikipedia for all of twenty-six minutes a year and a half ago. Ravenswing 18:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. I believe Ravenswing meant to reference WP:A7 rather than WP:G7, but A7 clearly states that claims of importance have a much lower threshold than claims of notability. I'm not convinced A7 is applicable, but I will not oppose if anyone tags the article with {{db-person}}. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 23:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Although I think this issue is moot, I do not think speedy is in order since - although not mentioned in the article - he has represented Slovakia at the WJC, which would seem to be enough of a claim of importance to avoid speedy. Rlendog (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not even a claim that this player is notable. Lepricavark (talk) 22:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NHOCKEY. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 19:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.