Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathew Tully (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mathew Tully

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be one significant case, which iis not enough for notability as a lawyer. The refs seem to emphasis his purple heart, the most trivial of US awards, tho he does have one higher--tho not high enough for notability in connection with it --I conclude that the purpose of this article is advertising his practice. . DGG ( talk ) 06:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MdsShakil (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —MdsShakil (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just promotional. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BASIC, lots of promotional fluff. Mztourist (talk) 12:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet BASIC. I wouldn't say the Purple Heart is the most trivial of US awards (there are many that are FAR more trivial), but it's not near enough on its own for any kind of notability. Intothat darkness 19:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.