Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Caruana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Caruana

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG; fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:56, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom and no sources. ImmortalWizard(chat) 20:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above--simply playing in the ECHL is not enough for NHOCKEY Enwebb (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Falls short of NHOCKEY and GNG. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNo secondary sources to establish GNG, doesn't meet the inclusionary standards of NHOCKEY. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. -The Gnome (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.