Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Bogdanos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Bogdanos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Notability. Can't distinguish what he is actually notable for. All links are self-published articles in professional journals or for awards he has been given in the military. — Ocatecir ^T 23:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If he won the National Humanities Medal, isn't that pretty much notability in a nutshell? A maximum of 12 people per year get that award, which is usually presented by the US President. That makes me think a Keep is in order. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 00:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dennis Brown's reasoning appears accurate, and in my mind, seems sufficient. But independently, I feel that WP:GNG is met by the sources present in the article. --j⚛e decker ^talk 06:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per awards and press coverage. Pburka (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article needs some work, but the sources meet WP:GNG, and the individual meets WP:BIO. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.