Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Perryman Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. With the small amount of participation it would be fair to revisit this AfD sooner or later. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 02:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Perryman Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I could not find any RSes to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Could not find significant coverage. Many hist in this HighBeam search but it turns out none constitute significant coverage, in my opinion. ~Kvng (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This musician has been significantly covered in reliable sources with regards to his music, where this passes notability guidelines,for a music biography to be created for him. He has been written album in a biography from AllMusic, Relevant magazine interview, The Huffington Post interview. His album, Swallow the Sea, was reviewed by AllMusic and PopMatters. The subsequent album, Land of the Living, was reviewed by American Songwriter and Christianity Today.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw the AllMusic bio, but when none of the albums had ratings I assumed none were reviewed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Changing !vote based on sources found by The Cross Bearer especially: [1], [2], [3], [4] ~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.