Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Yeo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Yeo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's subject is known only for his membership in a quiz team; I can find no evidence (in e.g. a Google search for "matthew+yeo"+-"university+challenge" "matthew yeo" -"university challenge") that he is otherwise notable. I believe WP:BLP1E applies and that the subject does not meet WP:BIO requirements. Gonzonoir (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Declan Clam (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the same reasons gone over ad nauseam at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail Trimble. Pure BLP1E, and all the "these people are all going to be famous after this" voices seem to have gone strangely silent. – iride scent 19:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was the Trimble precedent (heh, sounds kind of like a Forties detective pulp/Coen brothers title) that made me bring this here rather than PRODding. The smaller volume of coverage here makes this seem clearer-cut, too. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not sufficiently notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above, WP:BLP1E. GlassCobra 16:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.