Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxeen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maxeen

Poorly written (no wikilinks), and fails to establish notability in any real sense. Neo 21:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep [1] & [2]. PJM 21:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MUSIC. Come back when you've released a couple of major albums or gone on tour. Stifle 22:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Mo0[talk] 07:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, album release, media coverage, and signed to major label. Kappa 07:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep minor notablity.--MONGO 09:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Kappa. I'm No Parking and I approved this message 17:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This band is listed on Wikipedia:Millionth topic pool. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 19:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's where I spotted it. Its a reasonable place to patrol about once a week for the creation of non-encyclopaedic, or badly written articles. --Neo 23:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep They're signed. Tlogmer 01:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete as per nomination. How many non-notable bands are there in the world? Do we want an article on every single one? Gaius Cornelius 17:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.