Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Nahid Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Md Nahid Islam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:CREATIVE. Main claim to fame is that he was the youngest professional sports photographer. Articles was draftified yesterday from Md. Nahid Islam, sourced only with the dailycricket.com.bn sports blog post. Today it's been recreated with a second sports blog post from rabsportsnews.com, dated today, not a good sign of an independent source. A WP:BEFORE search turned up no coverage in reliable sources in English or Bengali (নাহিদ ইসলাম). Editors searching for any RS I missed please note that Nahid Islam is an unrelated activist. Wikishovel (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Cricket, Football, and Bangladesh. Wikishovel (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Just a journalist doing his job, with no established notability. Svartner (talk) 01:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NBIO. I could find no reliable sources to establish notability. Ratekreel (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt: given it was re-created after draftification, title should be salted as well. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 01:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - besides the subject’s lack of significant coverage about him, the page is very poorly written. It’s not even an article. Bearian (talk) 02:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.