Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md Rasel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md Rasel

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Md Rasel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Here the most sources describe only controversies about the actor. The sources don't describe his career, how he came to film industry and his personal life. He only acted one film. His biography isn’t notable. Mehedi Abedin 20:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for a Soft Deletion as the editor who PROD'd this article de-PROD'd it and sent it here instead.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment @Liz: I thought the removal of a PROD which rejects a soft deletion outcome was based on an editor assuming to oppose deletion by its removal? In this instance the deletion nominator was the only (de)PRODder and thus no one has actually contested it? Bungle (talk • contribs) 05:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to have to re-re-read those guidelines. I don't remember it being important WHY a PROD tag was removed, just that after the PROD tag has been removed, the article can't be considered for a PROD a second time. And a Soft Deletion is basically treating an AFD closure as if it was a PROD deletion. So, if since this article has gone through the PROD-De-PROD-Sent to AFD cycle, it can't be treated as a PROD a second time, even though it was the PRODder who removed the PROD. I've run into this several times recently at AFD and I don't know why some editors change their mind after PRODding an article and change it to an AFD discussion. PRODs are a much quicker form of deletion, as long as they aren't contested, than a typical AFD discussion. But again, I need to review the policy again. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: and @Bungle: Sorry for that. Actually I was going to AFD the page but I PROD it by mistake. That's why I removed the PROD tag because that was not my intention (to PROD it). I didn’t know that PROD can't be removed. Mehedi Abedin 11:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: I'd definitely be interested to see what the official stance is in these situations, as surely the whole point of not soft deleting in this instance is because of the removal of a former PROD which implies someone, at some point, has contested some previous proposal to delete the article. This is a fairly unique circumstance, especially as Mehediabedin has conveyed the PROD itself was a mistake (and therefore, invalid)? I think that explanation is entirely plausible given the difference of just 14mins from placing a PROD and sending to AfD. If there is a policy that says a PROD removal under any circumstance invalidates a soft delete at AfD (even if by the proposer themselves), then that needs some serious reconsideration for scenarios such as this. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Md_Rasel&oldid=1112972317"