Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medicinal Tree plantations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medicinal Tree plantations

I believe this page should be deleted because of the poorly written style. It has no coherent topic, is POV, and contains random facts contained in other articles. Nothing links to it, and it's not even clear that there should be an article for this topic, as it is rather obscure to begin with. --Mathwizard1232 01:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Aren't articles supposed to be easy to read? This thing's a mess. Royboycrashfan 01:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It looks like a how-to guide on how to grow medicinal trees, and it's either copied from somewhere or it's original research. --Kinu 02:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --M @th wiz 2020 02:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as beofre.Blnguyen 02:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, its a pile of giberish. Mike _{(T C)} 04:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Avi 04:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- there's no need for an article on this, even if well written. Reyk 06:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-02-09 06:49Z
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 08:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Krashlandon (e) 13:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hardly an article. Elfguy 14:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mikkerpikker ... 17:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The potential of the article being properly written is there. If it goes through a major revamp, we should keep it. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 17:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nick Catalano (Talk) 23:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Car salesman 14:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom with the caveat that this AfD should not be held against any future article that might actually contain real content. :) Turnstep 01:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.