Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Shakespeare Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Shakespeare Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable theatre company. No independent references except for reviews on a couple of local blogs, and I couldn't find anything further. Being kind, it's too soon. Boneymau (talk) 07:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The free publication The Weekly Review had this news item. The rest is just as the nominator says: despite the size of Melbourne and the notability of Shakespeare, I can't seem to find reviews in major media, beyond blogs, at this time. Unfortunately I think it does fail WP:ORG. Delete Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.