Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Hartley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Hartley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:CREATIVE. for (;;) (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. for (;;) (talk) 16:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm repeating myself, but here goes: The subject of this article fails WP:ARTIST: The artist is not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. Se is not is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. Se has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work, and her work has not been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Her work has not has become a significant monument, has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, has not won significant critical attention, and is not is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. The awards won are minor, non-notable awards. The WP:COI, the WP:ELs in the body and the promotional tone don't help either. Mduvekot (talk) 18:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - locally known, run of the mill artist, who has not even exhibited in Sydney, Australia, much less a real art capital. Bearian (talk) 19:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.