Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Odabash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 04:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Odabash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is classified as a stub 'deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject' and has only been self promoting since being on the site as well as various spamming Folexyz (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG. Subject of article is covered in Telegraph 2015, Telegraph 2016 (short), LA Times 2016 (short article), Evening Standard 2016, The Times 2016 (subscription), Marie Claire 2015, and is in the tabloids quite a bit. It's clear she's a designer to the rich & famous and her work also gets a lot of press. Also the article is hardly too short, though it could be expanded. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. This AfD is this editor's only contribution to Wikipedia. Article is more promotional than I would like, but perhaps less so than it was (and I've seen much worse), and hopefully people will stop trying to trim six years off her age! Edwardx (talk) 22:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.