Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercedes Helnwein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mercedes Helnwein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage. All press mentions appear to be inherited from her father Gottfried Helnwein. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the problem here is that the article uses poor sources to fluff up her notability. However there are decent sources available (e.g. Google news search: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), and the article can be trimmed and updated with the new sources. ThatMontrealIP (talk)
Keep I'm in agreement with ThatMontrealIP that more RS exist that are substantial coverage. Also, I don't believe that Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED applies here. Her father is often mentioned in passing but isn't the subject of the article. Theredproject (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources provided by ThatMontrealIP clearly show that RS exist in sufficient supply to meet GNG (per WP:NEXIST State of sourcing in the article itself doesn't matter in terms of delete/keep as long as sources exist). In terms of WP:INHERIT, I think its safe to say there are enough sources that mention the father briefly only insofar as it would be bad journalism to not say 'this artist has a father who is also an artist and is relatively famous'. Samsmachado (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per sources found by ThatMontrealIP that show significant coverage in reliable sources. Netherzone (talk) 00:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found by ThatMontrealIP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.