Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi Música

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ally Brooke. Seems like a pretty clear WP:SNOW case here. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mi Música

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mi Música

This song does not satisfy song notability, at least not at this time, because it neither satisfies any of the criteria that normally indicate that general notability is likely to be satisfied, nor does it directly satisfy general notability. Songs that do not satisfy song notability are usually redirected, to the album, or to the artist or the artist's discography. In this case, the album has not yet been released, and the single was released in advance. The article does not explain how the song is notable. It says that the song has been released; we knew that. None of the references are independent secondary coverage of the song. They are either about the (pending) album, or are associated with the artist.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	Billboard	Announcement of plans for album	Yes	Not about the song	Yes	No
2	Youtube	Music video of the song, on the artist's Youtube channel	No	Yes	No	No
3	wearemitu.com	Interview with the artist	No	Not about the song	Probably	No
4	songdata.io	Information about the song	Yes	Not as to coverage of the song - Contains metadata about the song	Yes	No
5	Apple Music	States that the song is available on Apple Music	Yes	No	Yes	No

This article was originally prepared in draft, and the title in article space was a redirect to the discography, but the submitter replaced the redirect with the draft, and then replaced the draft with a redirect to the article. These actions were permitted, but they don't establish notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Mexico, and United States of America. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the discography. There is no evidence that WP:NSINGLE is met, and the sourcing in the article and my own searches do not turn up anything to suggest a standalone article is justified. -- Whpq (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Just another demonstration of the creating user's disregard for the notability of songs. (They've also shown no qualms about adding unsourced material, and have created drafts for speculative or outright fake album titles.) Ss112 08:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ally Brooke discography, fails WP:NSONG. Fully agree with Ss112, this editor is borderline disruptive – they currently have three AfC creations submitted where they have made up the name of the album and stated release dates, even though neither of these things have been confirmed. Richard3120 (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. I note in addition that the disruptive editor has gone so far as to try to add a deletion notice to this page. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.