Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micaela Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shereth 20:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Micaela Johnson

Unsourced article about a person that does not indicate notability. Lack of sources does not allow us to back up this information. The article is written out of NPOV. —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 20:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lack of sources means tagging an article for such and looking for them before nominating for deletion to see if an article can be improved.[1], [2], [3]. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's our problem here on Wikipedia. We ask for citations before introduction of articles, and then, we're not consistent, and say, "what the heck? It's our problem now. We'll fix it." ESpublic013 (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Viewed MichaelQSchmidt sources and disagree that it's notable. The article sounds "self promotional" and has not done anything notable in her roles. Tree Karma (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If reliable sources do not bother to cover a topic, neither should we. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. The sources provided above look to be a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders fan page, a listing of three news articles with her name mentioned that don't appear to actually be about her, and a directory entry on a site which looks like a linkedin clone. - Whpq (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.