Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Arbouet
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Only objection or "keep" vote rests on a hypothetical argument that was not substantiated. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Michael Arbouet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article on a producer of non-notable low budget films (with some other minor work), which fails to establish notability, and was paid for by the subject. There are no reliable independent sources primarily about the subject. Guy (Help!) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As long as neutral articles about Mr. Arbouet could be found, I think this entry could be kept.TH1980 (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. A news search brings up this passing mention and that's it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.