Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Austin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Austin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This strikes me as inappropriate per WP:BLP1E, with an eye towards the substantial meaning (if not the letter of) WP:PERP as well. I don't see evidence of substantial sustained coverage after the release. joe decker ^{talk to me} 01:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —joe decker ^{talk to me} 06:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- wrongful conviction and nothing else to show for notability--AssegaiAli (talk) 12:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unfortunately unnotable because the only claim to notability is his exoneration, which are not notable.Curb Chain (talk) 22:02, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.