Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Blakey (musician) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Sock creation. See note. Star Mississippi 14:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Blakey (musician)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to the AfD at this title, also deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Blakey (music producer). Not a G4, but nothing to indicate that the factors surrounding deletion have changed. Sourcing appears of insufficient quality, depth and reliability Star Mississippi 01:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom. Star Mississippi 01:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per arguments in previous AfDs. The most likely route to notability would likely be the association with Tears for Fears, but I couldn't find anything to substantiate that. Jfire (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as incessant puffery. Note that the creator of the previous version, User:JessicaBruton, was blocked for undisclosed paid editing. And now we have a brand new account whose first edits are creating this one... Fram (talk) 08:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article and sourcing does little to establish the subject's notability. I can't find a good source for his involvement with Tears for Fears which is currently unsourced, except a few sources like this.[1] Beyond the state of the current article, it's already been deleted twice, and both prior AfDs included what has been tagged or commented as suspected sockpuppets and COI. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 09:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Trivial sources that don't pass WP:BASIC. ––FormalDude (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: Article creator blocked as a sock. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.