Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Israel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't seem to meet any subject-specific guideline. With text like "world-renowned", this is likely some sort of autobiography. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This artist fails our notability guideline for artists. He got a brief burst of press attention regarding a painting he did of Donald Trump, but that coverage focused on the legalities of a charitable donation, not on this artist. Another Michael Israel has more press coverage. He was an American killed while fighting against ISIS in Syria. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Comparing yourself with Picasso is strictly forbidden. ^[Humor] No sustained critical attention, no substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.