Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Dugré
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Michel Dugré (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as an unsuccessful election candidate, which is not a claim of notability that gets a person past WP:POLITICIAN. The only other substantive assertion here is that he wrote one article in a magazine, which isn't enough to get him past WP:AUTHOR either. I'm willing to withdraw this if a stronger and better-sourced claim of notability can be made, but it's a delete in its current state. Bearcat (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails our notability guidelines for politicians and authors. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Being a perenial candiate for office that rarely recieves over a single percentage point is a clear indicator of non-notability. Hasteur (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet notability guidelines for politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.