Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Figuet
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 12:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Michel Figuet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be an autobiography about a photographer that lacks coverage in reliable sources writing about him to establish notability. He is certainly an accomplished working professional photographer with photo credits in major magazines. See [1] for one such example. However, I can find no coverage about him. Assertions about exhibitions are not backed up with any specifics, and I was not able to dig up anything in my searches. Whpq (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for photographers. Armbrust Talk Contribs 19:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree that doesn't appear to meet WP:CREATIVE, similarly there's no non-trivial coverage of the photographer (e.g., ignoring photo credits, etc.) that would reach the general notability guideline. (A pity, b/c I like his work.) --j⚛e deckertalk 01:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.