Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Outlook (mobile app)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) EggRoll97 ^(talk) 02:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Outlook (mobile app)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was merged to Microsoft Outlook way back 2020. No consensus to restore. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Microsoft Outlook as before. Aintabli (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The original merge was without consensus. It’s a completely different program from the desktop app with separate history. Just because it has the same name doesn’t mean it’s the same thing. It’s like merging Sonic the Hedgehog (1991) with Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) --MSMST1543 (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MSMST1543. Its established and notable history as a separate app was decimated by the merge argument that it is one and the same with the desktop software of the same name, when it is not. ViperSnake151 Talk 02:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: For such reason, it is an acceptable fork per WP:OKFORK. CastJared (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clarify what you mean by "such reason"? Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 16:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Such article splitting. CastJared (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Was there an original discussion about making a redirect here? It's not clear to me what consensus is being circumvented, but I see that the page has been moved a few times, so maybe I'm missing an old AfD or talk page discussion? As is right now this seems like a procedural close; I don't understand why this has been brought to AfD. There's no arguments being made about notability here and as far as I can see this isn't a CSD G4 situation or similar. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 17:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was at Talk:Microsoft Outlook/Archive 1#Merger proposal. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.