Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles-Butler Hughton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article does not contain reliable sources demonstrating the notability. Despite all the efforts, the sources have not been found. It is unlikely they exist at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miles-Butler Hughton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with very minor roles so far and sourced only to IMDB too early for an article. Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong have you deleted my other source because IMDB was not my only source. Also who put my article for deleation. SillyPotatoe (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The other "reference" was his Twitter account...Twitter is NOT a reliable reference and neither is IMDB because anyone can edit there. Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a threat?SillyPotatoe (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is an AfD. See WP:AFD. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Miles Butler-Hughton to see new refrences.SillyPotatoe (talk) 19:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen my resourcesSillyPotatoe (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:SillyPotatoe. Sorry, but people will comment when they comment, so it is best not to prod them to do so. I have a few views about this topic, but I don't have time for it right now. Somtimes you just have to wait! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you decided what you are doing with my article?SillyPotatoe (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. It's way too early for this actor to have an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Clarityfiend may I refer to Kia Pegg articleSillyPotatoe (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Found several film reviews and news articles including information about Kia Pegg, but not much about Mr. Hughton. —Anne Delong (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'm adding one more source.SillyPotatoe (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closung DiscussionSillyPotatoe (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SillyPotatoe, you have to wait for an administrator to close this deletion discussion; you can't close it on your own. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Therefore, not yet notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My article has his profile on Robert Kelly Associates at the bottom of resources. And the dumping Ground is notable.SillyPotatoe (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:ENT. And no, a listing by his agents is not an independent source. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has him in the list and his notability. Also the Shannon Flynn article has agents list.SillyPotatoe (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to understand how Wikipedia defines notability. And Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shannon_Flynn. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.