Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MintCookie Games
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- MintCookie Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "MintCookie Games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
WP:NOTE Not yet notable video game company. Have not yet released any games and their Kickstarter campaign has only made $11 so far. It seems to be made by the creator of the kickstarter project based on their username. Elzbenz (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Also, their Kickstarter, company and any other of their games have not yet had any press coverage that I can find. Elzbenz (talk) 06:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of reliable sources establishing notability. I might suggest that a prod may have been more appropriate. --Izno (talk) 14:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't properly consider the Proposed deletion process. Thanks for making me aware - I will consider in future. Sorry for participating in new pages without realising this. Elzbenz (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Gotta' learn somehow. --Izno (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I didn't properly consider the Proposed deletion process. Thanks for making me aware - I will consider in future. Sorry for participating in new pages without realising this. Elzbenz (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as seemingly too soon for better notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable video game developer failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Much WP:TOOSOON to have received any coverage before they even release any products. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete for all the reasons above --Kiyoshiendo (talk) 02:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.