Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Waheed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - I'll admit the article needs expanding a hell of a lot but notability is there. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Waheed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently has only one novel he has done. Don't see much notability either. Wgolf (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Having only one published novel doesn't allow to pass WP:GNG completely. Since this is just like one interview on his novel, which shows converge in independent source. But needs lots of more coverage to completely pass GNG. A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 18:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actually, he has written two novels, "The Book of Gold Leaves" and "The Collaborator". These novels have been reviewed in the Telegraph [1] the Independent [2] and The Guardian. [3] [4] These sources seem sufficient to meet WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO. Everymorning talk 20:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Subject meets WP:NAUTHOR #3 and #4 (they have created a work that has been subject of multiple independent reviews/critical attention). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Everymorning. PamD 23:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.