Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misbahudduja University Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misbahudduja University Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about a university center, which belongs to the university of which we have no article. Unless in special circumstances, such organizations would not be notable, and, indeed, there is not a slightest indication of notability in the article. It could have been notable as a building if built by a famous architect for example but this has not been shown either.Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Unable to find reliable sources to verify the notability of Misbahudduja University (which seems to be a distance learning organisation). In addition the article is about a "Centre" of the university. Clearly does not belong to Wikipedia. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Comment: The author of the article seems to have created multiple articles (Wahabpora,Mosiviyat Enclave,Al-Mehdi Chowk) with questionable notability and all of them contain references to "Almehdi Islamic Library, Raheislam Organisation". --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to make a claim of notability. Also fails WP:NGEOG, Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and the general notability guidelines. There is no independent coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.