Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mischief Masters

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete · Katefan0^(scribble) 22:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mischief Masters

Delete: a borderline A1 speedy. IMDb hasn't heard of a movie series by this title, although there is some ulta-obscure Mischief Masters: A New Master for which we don't have an article and IMDb hasn't got 5 votes (IMDb:IS a democracy). Nn something-or-other. -Splash 21:51, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more discussion. Relisted on Sep 12. --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 12:31, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it exists and warrants an article, two POV sentences don't cut it. Delete. TheMadBaron 21:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Having actually looked at the article, I'm surprised it passed through RC patrol. It's got an entry on imdb ([1]) but nobody involved has any history and there is no real indication that it's received any kind of exposure or acquired any following: delete. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 22:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Trust me, it very nearly didn't pass through RC patrol, but I couldn't stretch a speedy tag to make it fit. -Splash 03:13, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If I could, I'd also vote to delete that imdb page, which appears to be the result of some vanity publicity slipping through whatever filters they have. I suppose there's a chance that this is a real Dutch movie series, perhaps not usually translated as "Mischief Makers." I'm willing to take that chance. Bunchofgrapes 22:46, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong speedy delete. Two falsifiable sentences is really something we shouldn't keep. This is not a big epic like Star Wars. If it was, someone would've heard of it and voted on IMDB. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:24, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.