Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth 2016 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Earth 2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again an unsourced crystal ball without useful content. Already removed earlier after a normal procedure Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth 2016 The Banner talk 11:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, per former deletions, should have CSD'd. AddMore der Zweite (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I did put a CSD on it but that was removed. The Banner talk 12:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete [1] Legacypac (talk) 11:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete again. Problems noted at the first deletion debate persist. No reliably sourced venue. No date. No reliable source coverage found. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - To be honest this should've been G4'd as there's nothing different from the last AFD, Fails CRYSTAL & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now to Miss Earth in case to WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL was the best known so far almost deleted against the article. Oripaypaykim (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- When you redirect it, you have to be constant vigilant against recreation. That will happen on average once a week. After deletion it will be salted after the third recreation. The Banner talk 21:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem with redirecting is after a week of redirecting a fan will come along revert and no one's none the wiser (it's happened a few times!) whereas if it's deleted we then know if it's been created or not, –Davey2010^Talk 22:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now and protect - WP:CRYSTAL. Protection until the event comes near should do the job. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And shortly after protection, it will be recreated as the The 16th Miss Earth Pageant. This needs to go and stay gone. A G4 speedy works for me. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.