Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Kurdistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Kurdistan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not complete and confusing. Why are there different sections for 2012 and 2013 and are 2016 and 2017 missing? » Shadowowl | talk 11:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - But TNT even if Keep There are a few more acceptable sources than they've included (2016 candidated nominated), Paegeant raises society questions and Gallery with couple of details. I wouldn't say this satisfies, all other articles seem to just be one liner bits about a Miss Kurdistan and something completely unrelated. Article doesn't really contribute anything even if kept - there may be a WP:NOT that applies. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 16:35, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~between weak keep (more so) and weak delete.~~ The topic is clearly notable see Category:Beauty pageants by country, so ~~weak~~ keep. The local language is not english so finding english sources will be a tough task. based on the available sources and verifiability, I would assume passes WP:GNG Kurdistan is not a country, not yet at least. Its an ethnic geographic area, but then there are several such pageant articles for geographical area within a country, see the category above. --DBig Xray 09:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updated moved to keep from weak keep based on refs presented below.--DBig Xray 20:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are enough sources in English [1][2][3], doubtless there are more in Kurdish, therefore should satisfy WP:GNG. Article can be improved but that's a different issue. Hzh (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.