Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe Romania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe Romania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability. fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 00:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. sst✈^discuss 01:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Seems like the article has been gutted recently. Does this major pageant get covered every year in Romania? Of course.[1]--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - While I could find no significant coverage of the pageant (at least in English), there are some mentions, which btw is not sufficient to keep this article. Delete until better sources can be found.—UY Scuti ^Talk 08:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, i really don't want to have to go put in a slew of Romanian sources in this article. The Banner is not a pageant fan, nor am I, I just prefer improvement to deletion when a subject is notable.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not that I dislike pageants as such. It is more that I dislike advertising, promo, sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry what is unfortunately quite common among pageants. The Banner talk 17:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is definitely true, and seen most often on the low-tier type pageant articles that you track down, and I'm glad someone is doing it. Its been my experience that Miss Universe and its constituent country articles will rarely if ever be non-notable.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is only correct for the bigger countries. The Banner talk 20:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails EVENT & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources and poorly referenced. Vs⁶ ₅⁰⁷ 05:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.