Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modoka Studios Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modoka Studios Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Topic was deleted at AfD previously: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modoka. Author has continuously recreated the article different names Modoka and Modoka Studios without ever establishing notability. The article's references consist of a GameSpot database page with no information about the company, a GameFAQs page (unreliable source) and 2 primary sources directly from the company's website. A reliable video game web source search for ""Modoka Studios" yields a pitiful 10 results, none of which cover the company in any depth. The1337gamer (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the draft was moved to main by the author after an AfC submission was rightly declined due to lack of notability. I see no admissible coverage in independent reliable sources. Rentier (talk) 21:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note to the closing admin: If the result is delete, can we also get rid of the redirect Modoka Studios? Rentier (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 3 of the 5 references point to the company's website, and the others are game reviews. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 23:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article. And the redirect Modoka Studios as well. This company really is not notable, at all, there are a few mentions I see on the internet and what has been discussed above, but nothing in depth or substantial, therefore the article does not meet the policy requirements. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Modoka, Modoka Studios and Modoka Studios Entertainment as non-notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Modoka Studios is currently a redirect to Video gaming in the Netherlands so it will need to go to RFD if you want that deleted.--64.229.165.48 (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not mentioned in the article so I don't see why the admin can't make a judgement call, IMO._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & salt - You could make an arguement that the "Saddies Attack!" game more notability than that of the article here, and that wouldn't beat an AfD. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.