Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MomentCam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MomentCam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my boldly removed PROD yet it was specific and genuine about the concerns listed including that this article is only existing as PR advertising, and that is actually emphasized by the fact the advertising-only account "MomentCam" removed it (note how this one account has been the only one to ever actually contribute to this article). SwisterTwister talk 03:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 09:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete TheNextWeb is a minor RS, but it's fluff coverage and not enough to base notability or indeed an article on by itself - David Gerard (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep NPOV - Direct links to mobile app listing on the Google Play Store [1] and [App Store https://itunes.apple.com/app/id687624831?id=com.manboker.headportrait&hl=en] are used to state unbias facts about description of app, for example, when it was launched, languages and description of app. These references are unbias and have no purpose for PR, simply used to describe app. Problems with other articles used to cite information can be fixed through editing to ensure non-PR sounding tone and the whole article doesn't need to be deleted. TechInAsia,TechNode(part of TechInAsia) and VentureBeat are all credible 3rd party news sources. No information comes from company created PR materials. Citings from the NextWeb were facts that were cited in the original news article based on facts from AppsFire and App Annie. --MomentCam (talk) 05:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)MomentCam[reply]

Editor blocked. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment app listings mean nothing for notability and that not every news source, by name, is going to be notable --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam on an unremarkable app. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.