Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Vanderwaal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Pretty Little Liars characters. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Vanderwaal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character who doesn't warrant an article. Everything here that isn't plot summaries is/should already found at List of Pretty Little Liars characters. The following characters also should be deleted, for the same reason:

Beerest355 Talk 18:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 19:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 19:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to List of Pretty Little Liars characters. If there are sources that discuss the characters, those sources should be carried over to the list article. I don't think it necessary to merge the entire detailed plot summaries, but there may be some prose worth carrying over as well. The names of the characters are well-known, and should redirect to the list article in the absence of some other viable subject of the same name. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 19:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect per UltraExactZZ. As nom states, these characters do not appear to warrant standalone articles. Gong show 05:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect - per UltraExactZZ. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 15:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.