Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Calvo-Dahlborg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monique Calvo-Dahlborg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient claims of notability to meet WP:PROF RadioFan (talk) 00:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 1. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 01:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a resume, not notable--Star Log, Lfrankblam, Kirk Out (talk) 07:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is more of a resume than an article. Lacks the coverage required by the GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She is clearly quite active in her field and in politics, but unfortunately I don't find any significant third-party resources, even though her name comes up often online. Perhaps there are significant resources in the French press, in which case she may be a better candidate for the French WP. LaMona (talk) 02:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.