Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moodie Drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moodie Drive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to establish notability. After a search I've been unable to find anything which could possibly suggest it could be notable. Af course, given its a local road I highly doubt any improvements could rectify this issue. 59abcd (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication why this generic road is notable or needs an article any more than any other of the millions of roads on the planet for which you can similarly name a distance, termini, speed limit, and intersections. Seems lots more on Template:Ottawa Roads should go too. Reywas92^Talk 20:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not merit inclusion. Just a garden variety road. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As always, the notability bar for a road is not just the ability to write a bit of information about the road's physical characteristics — every road that exists at all has physical characteristics by definition, so the distinction between a notable road and a non-notable road hinges on the ability to write and reliably source some social, cultural, political or historical context for what might make the road more significant than most other roads. This article is not clearing that bar. Bearcat (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.