Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosaic Adventure
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Mosaic Adventure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded for failing WP:NCORP with no secondary sources, just some TripAdvisor reviews and company database links. Unprodded by User:Jackynepal with the explanation that "Citing and sources will be added. This company has lots of information available on web.", but the only reliable sources I can find are of the "John Smith at Big Company said..." variety. McGeddon (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there's nothing at all for the applicable notability, being the largest is still not always something solid to save an article and that seems to be the case here. It's also only about 7 years old so it's unlikely to have a colossal amount of sources. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Subject lacks strong independent sources. TripAdvisor simply doesn't cut it. Meatsgains (talk) 02:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.