Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshe Kaitz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 23:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Moshe Kaitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined a Prod that remained for 7 days because there is some significant coverage, but is it enough to establish notability? At this point I am not sure, this is a procedural nomination only. Original Prod rationale was: lacks notability. GB fan 17:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He has only 5 fights and non of them were for a top tier organization. He clearly fails WP:MMANOT. Astudent0 (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I put this article up for PROD for the same reasons mentioned by Astudent0. Papaursa (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He doesn't pass the criteria at WP:MMANOT and I found nothing else that shows he's notable. Mdtemp (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.