Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorola ROKR U9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Smashville^talk 22:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Motorola ROKR U9

Non notable cell phone per WP:PRODUCT. Algébrico (talk) 07:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you delete this, you may have to consider deleting all the other ROKR pages, or - a better solution - merging them all into one page:

... unless the U9 is really significantly less noteworthy than the others, which is certainly possible. Hairhorn (talk) 12:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all into ROKR, which is currently a disambiguation to them (and a Japanese airport). Grandmartin11 (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- You probebly would merge into Motorola ROKR. Mukadderat (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge All into ROKR, possibly expand any significant coverage into separate article. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 01:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (along with the E8, E6 (and its many unfree images, Z6, Z6m) for the same reason). The entry(ies) fails WP:PRODUCT guidelines and has no reliable sources I can find, a promotions site isn't reliable and motorola themselves aren't independent. If I came across this first, I'd have speedy deleted it as blatant spam. E1 and E2 have potential. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E1 should definitely stay, or be the focus of the merged article. It was Apple's first attempt at a cell phone. Hairhorn (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A good example of why the entirety should be merged. Later models/revisions can touch upon revisions or notable instaces, but I don't think there is enough merit for each one to get a separate article. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 03:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all. The line is notable; individual iterations in a given line of products don't always measure up even if the general product does. I think this is a case where while the entire line is notable, we don't need seven or eight articles for it.Tyrenon (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all or Keep all per Tyrenon and notices about out-item notability. I also comment about Hairhorn. If one of it deleted, why others deleted? The Junk Police (reports|works) 01:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge into Motorola ROKR. Mukadderat (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.