Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mound Marked C

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mound Marked C

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. Perhaps some archaeologist can enlighten us but I can't find anything to indicate the significance. There certainly are mounds in the area and this one appears in various archeological survey reports of the Raj era but, well, so what? Does being old somehow confer notability? Sitush (talk) 18:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 22:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim for WP:N is advanced in the article and no sources are cited. In a sane world this would have been an A-7 CSD, but places are not covered by that. Being old can in some cases help establish N if there is more to it. Inhabited places have largely gained a presumption of N. Such is not the case here though. As the article stands right now, it doesn't come close to passing GNG. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. No claim for notability, nor any sources provided. I guess it would only qualify as a PROD though since A7 doesn't seem to apply here. I'm confused why it's called a mound in the article but tagged as an archaeological monument. mikeman67 (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.