Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Gravatt Plaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 03:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Gravatt Plaza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Australian shopping centre/mall. No reliable sources, independent of the subject and each other, have been provided. The article reads like an advertisement and was created by a SPA, Masteryacine5 (talk · contribs), who has created a series of articles on shopping centres that are claimed to be owned by a person named Yu Feng Mattinbgn\^talk 21:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 21:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable shopping centre, cruddy article. Yu Feng isn't a person; it's a company, which appears to have stakes in a string of often prominent shopping centres (see a list on this page, search down for Yu Feng to get to it). Rebecca (talk) 21:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subregional, only 35 stores. Not notable by usual standards for shopping centers. Rebecca, do we perhaps need an article for the company, which could mention the centers? DGG (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As nominator I would not be opposed to a merge of this article (and the others recently listed at AfD) into an article on parent company. There has been no evidence supplied of the notability any of the listed centres (other than a personal assertion) but there has been some demonstration of the notability of the parent company. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't perceive notability based on what's in the article. If the place is notable then the article hasn't explained why. Every shopping centre in the world should not have an article just by virtue of existing. And I think 'cruddy article' is in fact sufficient justification for deletion -- if cruddy enough. :) But I do like the suggestion that the malls be deleted, and that someone do research on Yu Feng. A company that owns a large number of shopping centres might be notable in its own right, even if the shopping centres aren't. brianlucas (talk) 00:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails the most relevant criterion, that is, WP:Notability (organizations and companies). WWGB (talk) 01:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Centro Shopping Centres in Australia where the inclusion has merit and context. Delete. Maybe combine ALLthese "Australian shopping centre/mall" articles into one grand AfD... as responding one by one by one by one by one is getting tedious, and each has makes the exact claim or lack of notability... and all were authored by the same person. Fails WP:N as WP:ADVERT. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, or at least not shown, as all the others. Have those copy/pasting looked at the articles?Yobmod (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.