Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Righteous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus/keep. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Righteous

Does not meet WP:MUSIC's notability requirements for bands or artists. Also, only source is a blog which is not W:RS Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 23:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I did find this, but the website doesn't appear to be reputable or well known. -Senseless!... says you, says me 23:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: trivial coverage, no awards, no charts, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of third-party, non trivial coverage, being on MySpace is not an assertion of notability. -Senseless!... says you, says me 23:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The band appears to have received significant coverage in a number of Texas media: [1] [2] [3] as well as a few others that are behind a pay wall. I'd say it's enough to recommend a keep, per WP:BAND criterion #1. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BAND, in its examples, characterizes as "trivial coverage" directory-like listings of performance dates, or contact or booking details. The articles to which I offered links above are not like that at all: they are articles that are entirely about this band. The citations do need to be added to the article, with content added to the article, but that's an editing issue, not a deletion issue. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources provided by Paul Erik. It meets WP:MUSIC. Tim meh ! 18:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the above sources it meets WP:MUSIC. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.