Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouthwash (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While not a strong consensus there does appear to be a consensus that the available sources do not satisfy our notability requirements. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mouthwash (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of hits when searching but none come under WP:RS, so cannot be notable under WP guidelines. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week Delete - This "weak" vote surely isn't helping with the consensus process, but I must disagree with my longtime colleague Atlantic306 above. Those are indeed viable sources but I contend that each story is a minor introduction or brief review and I don't think they add up to enough significant and non-trivial coverage. The AllMusic bio helps their case, but beyond the sources listed by Atlantic306, I can find nothing beyond the typical retail/streaming sites and social media. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.